Morgan E. Pietz: A number one Trial Lawyer in Intellectual Residence and Defamation Regulation
Morgan E. Pietz: A number one Trial Lawyer in Intellectual Residence and Defamation Regulation
Blog Article
Morgan E. Pietz is a distinguished demo legal professional based in Culver Metropolis, California, identified for his expertise in intellectual house (IP) litigation, defamation, and sophisticated professional disputes. As being a founding associate of Pietz & Shahriari LLP, Pietz has crafted a reputation for his strategic litigation strategy and determination to defending the rights of individuals and firms from the Resourceful industries.
Instructional History and Lawful Vocation
Pietz gained his Juris Medical professional within the College of Southern California Gould School of Regulation in 2008. Soon thereafter, he started his authorized profession as an affiliate at Paul Hastings LLP, a popular world regulation organization. His early practical experience furnished a stable foundation in corporate regulation and litigation, which he later on expanded upon in his subsequent roles.
Before co-founding Pietz & Shahriari LLP, Pietz served like a associate at Gerard Fox Legislation, P.C., in Century City, California. All through this time, he managed a diverse range of conditions, which include substantial-profile defamation matters and IP disputes. His capacity to navigate intricate legal difficulties and provide favorable results for consumers led to his recognition to be a "Litigator on the 7 days" with the American Lawyer.
Notable Lawful Achievements
Pietz is perhaps most effective recognized for his job in dismantling Prenda Legislation, a infamous copyright trolling operation that focused hundreds of individuals with questionable infringement statements. His endeavours in the case of Ingenuity thirteen, LLC v. John Doe resulted in sanctions versus Prenda Law and its Lawyers, who were later on referred for felony prosecution. This landmark case has become called "Portion of authorized folklore" by the ABA Journal and it is commonly cited in conversations about abusive copyright litigation methods.
Together with his work in IP law, Pietz has productively represented purchasers in defamation cases involving anonymous on the internet harassment. Notably, in Nelson v. Top-quality Court docket, he secured a victory in the California Court of Attraction, making it possible for his customer to subpoena on the net company providers to identify a defamatory anonymous poster. This choice continues to be instrumental in shaping legal specifications for addressing on the internet defamation and safeguarding men and women' reputations.
Follow Regions
At Pietz & Shahriari LLP, Pietz focuses on numerous vital places:
Mental House Litigation: Representing clients in disputes over copyrights, logos, and trade techniques, specially in the fashion, entertainment, and technological know-how sectors.
Defamation and On line Harassment: Aiding people and businesses in addressing defamatory statements and cyberbullying, together with scenarios involving anonymous defendants.
Professional Litigation: Dealing with complicated business enterprise disputes, which include breach of contract, fraud, and insurance matters.
Creative Industries: Advising artists, designers, and amusement experts on lawful concerns connected to their operate and mental house legal rights.
Expert Recognition and Local community Involvement
Pietz continues to be continually recognized for his authorized prowess. He has long been selected on the Tremendous Lawyers checklist from 2019 to 2025 and was named a "Soaring Star" from 2014 to 2018. These honors reflect his standing amid friends and his determination to excellence within the authorized discipline.
Outside of his practice, Pietz is actively associated with the authorized Group. He has served as the President in the California Culture of Amusement Legal professionals and as Chair of The l. a. County Bar Affiliation’s Delegation to the Conference of California Bar Associations. His contributions to legal reform contain authoring a legislative proposal to amend California’s Anti-SLAPP legislation.
Conclusion
Morgan E. Pietz's job exemplifies a devotion to justice in addition to a strategic method of complex lawful challenges. His function in intellectual property and defamation law has not only protected the legal rights of his shoppers but has also affected lawful precedents that safeguard persons and corporations from the electronic age. Being a trial lawyer, Pietz proceeds for being a formidable advocate for anyone in search http://morganpietz.com/ of to copyright their legal legal rights within an progressively sophisticated legal landscape.